|
The
ITS Top Talent Newsletter August 2001
Don't
be Fooled by the Slowdown:
Talent Retention is still a Critical Business Issue
By
Dr. B. Lynn Ware, President and Founder,
Integral Talent Systems, Inc
Recent media
coverage about layoffs and disappointing corporate earnings has
colored the perceptions of companies who, only a few months ago,
were turning away business opportunities for lack of qualified workers.
Some of these companies assume that given the softening economy,
retention is no longer a critical business issue.
Our Fortune
1000 clients tell us that many of the current layoffs are in reaction
to the stock market and a function of "natural involuntary attrition":
- The unprecedented
boom and labor shortage of the past three years meant that companies
were unable to adjust their workforces for business changes, poor
performance, or hiring mistakes. Every worker was needed, regardless.
- Now, companies
can experience a more natural employment cycle, and we are seeing
the results of the delayed attrition in the headlines.
Qualified
Employees are Still Hard to Find
The underlying
fundamentals of workforce supply and demand have not changed. The
U.S. economy grew by 2% during Q1 2001. In February 2001, over 135,000
new jobs were created. Meanwhile, the talent shortage is getting
worse: by 2008, it is projected that the shortfall of qualified
workers in the U.S. will reach 7 million.
We also know
that select occupational groups, such as IT professionals, are still
a rare commodity. A recent report issued by the Information Technology
Association of America states that:
- IT employment
in 2001 is up 4% from last year, and now accounts for 7% of total
U.S. employment.
- In 2001 there
will be a shortfall of 425,000 IT workers with the needed skills
and training to fill job openings.
- Demand for
enterprise systems workers has increased by 62%; other high-demand
areas include programming, network design and administration,
and software engineering.
Stay
on the Alert for Signs of Defection
As it is generally
assumed that the stock market will recover by 2002, the declining
stock values of Fortune 1000 companies make their top talent ripe
for recruitment by privately held technology companies, who can
now offer a low strike price and possible hope to an employee whose
current company is in the tank. Projects being cancelled, lack of
funding, skill development opportunities being delayed, and valued
colleagues being "pink slipped" are all conditions that
become strong attrition triggers for the best talent in your company.
During this
temporary slowdown, your company should be as watchful as ever of
your top talent. Recruiters
know that uncertain times breed uncertain employees -- and they
are calling your people to fill any new job openings. In response,
many top executives are putting renewed effort into identifying
the people they want to keep and doing what they can to keep their
top talent committed and productive until the storm passes. In addition,
top management teams are using this time period to put the infrastructure
in place to gain organizational commitment from employees now before
business ticks up again early next year.
What
You Can Do
- Make sure
your managers are watching for early warning signals, including
low productivity, withdrawal, and increasing criticism of company
problems.
- When managers
notice early warning signals, they should be proactive -- and
schedule a private meeting with the employee to uncover possible
concerns.
- Communicate!
In uncertain times, many companies tend to "clam up" and reduce
internal communications. Make sure your mission-critical employees
know that they are valuable to you and feel included in
company strategy.
- Start an
"Employer of Choice" initiative now and gain momentum
before the upcoming economic upswing.
There are many
actions you can take to reduce unwanted attrition. With proactive
planning, you can keep your top employees through this period of
slower growth, and have the intellectual capital you will need to
stay ahead of the competition as the market rebounds. 
back
to current issue
|